Connect with us

Food Economy

Meet your (Meat) Maker at W.Va.’s Ham, Bacon, and Eggs Auction

Published

on

Wetzel County 4-H and FFA Ham Bacon and Egg Sale. Photo Corey Knollinger, WVPB

Across West Virginia, high schools offer career and technical education to give students a leg up in their fields before graduating. These programs can include skilled trades like welding, shop classes, or even meat processing.

Tucked away in a New Martinsville 4-H Camp, two auctioneers stand on a small indoor stage, denim-clad and wearing cowboy hats, securing bids on something a little unusual… ham, bacon, and eggs.

It’s a culminating event for high school students in Wetzel County who have overseen the entire ensuing meat and poultry process. Magnolia High School agriculture instructor Scott Ash explained that twenty kids are in the program.  

“They all take an animal, and raise it from young all the way through the process to about 250 to 300 pounds,” Ash said. “Then we send the animal to a USDA slaughterhouse and here in the meat lab we break down the carcass. We process the hams and the bacons.”

The auction  is part of Wetzel County’s career and technical education (CTE) program, which like many similar programs throughout the state, gives students a chance to learn hands-on career skills while still in high school.  

One of these students is Bailey Fayad, who said she loves the life lessons this program has taught her.

“It’s honestly a great thing to get involved in because it shows you a lot of responsibility outside of school, and the environment and stuff like that. It is definitely a great impact on kids that they need to do,” Fayad explained.

Wetzel County 4-H and FFA Ham Bacon and Egg Sale

Along with students from Magnolia, Hundred, and Pine Grove high schools, Fayad entered her ham and bacon to the Wetzel County 4-H and FFA Ham Bacon and Egg Sale.

This event has become an institution in the county. In its 51st year, the auction attracts prominent buyers including law offices, banks, and other prominent businesses from the community.  

The products can go for quite a bit of money, too. Ash mentioned it wasn’t unusual to see hams go for around $25 a pound.

All proceeds are passed back to the students, who invested the time and their own money into the product.

“Prime is kind of like a ‘way to go’, and choice is still pretty good, and then there’s your grands and your reserves,” Fayad explained about the various meat grades. “Grand champion is first place, and reserve champion is second place. And I actually received grand champion bacon, and I received prime on my ham this year.”

Meat sometimes is auctioned off at $25/pound – sometimes more. Photo: Cory Knollinger, WVPB

Bacon Champions

Fayad received the top prize for bacon in the county this year. This is her second time doing so, which earned her a new nickname, Bacon Queen.  

Last year, when she was a grand champion, the Bacon Queen’s meat went for about $2,000, but prices vary a lot depending on attending buyers on any given year. This year she made even more money.

“No, I did not expect $500 a pound. That was incredible,” Fayad said shortly after the bid closed on her grand champion bacon. “I actually feel pretty awesome right now.”

Fayad’s bacon weighed 6.7 pounds, fetching a final price of about $3,400 — a new record for the auction.

As the night went on over a hundred items were auctioned off, the ham and bacon were auctioned by pound and the eggs were sold by the dozen.

Each of the highest bidders has the option to keep their prize, donate it to the fire department’s yearly dinner, or donate it to be sold again in a fundraising event for Future Farmers of America and 4-H scholarships. All told, the auction can bring in as much as $75,000 for students.

After the county auction, students prepare for the state auction in Charleston where they will join students from all the other counties with similar meat processing, and FFA programs.

This article was originally published by West Virginia Public Broadcasting.

Food Economy

Study Links SNAP Spending to Job Creation

Published

on

The Trump administration is proposing big changes in the SNAP (a.k.a. food stamps) program. Some participants would receive foods directly, instead of purchasing them in local groceries. Photo: Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post/Getty Images

Increased food-assistance spending that was part of the 2009 economic stimulus package helped increase employment at the peak of the Great Recession, especially in rural areas, a first-of-its-kind study says.

During the peak and immediate aftermath of the Great Recession, nonmetropolitan counties gained one job for every $10,000 in increased SNAP redemptions, said the study, which was conducted by USDA Economic Research Service.

The economic impact in metropolitan areas was measurable but not as great. Metropolitan counties saw an increase of 0.4 jobs for every $10,000 in additional SNAP redemptions during the height of the recession, according to the study.

Counties in gray lack sufficient data for analysis.
Map: Daily Yonder/USDA ERS data. Source: USDA Economic Research Food Environment Atlas 2012Service  Get the data  Created with Datawrapper. Expand Map to Full Page

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 allotted an additional $40 billion in total SNAP benefits for low-income Americans from 2009 to 2013. The increase was enough to give each recipient an extra 13 percent in benefits. Part of the rationale for including increased SNAP benefits in the stimulus package was that the program would help both SNAP families and the greater economy, which would benefit from an infusion of cash-like benefits.

Previous studies have predicted that’s what happens with increased SNAP benefits. The ERS study is the first to confirm that prediction using historical economic data after the fact.

The study is also the first to look at the county-level impact of SNAP expenditures, giving economists a way to compare the economic impact in metropolitan vs. nonmetropolitan areas.

As expected, the economic impact was greater in rural areas, because the poverty rate is higher and a greater percentage of families participate in SNAP in nonmetropolitan counties.

The study controlled for other federal transfer payments, meaning the increase in employment is related to SNAP payments exclusively, not to other forms of government funding that went to individuals during the study period.

As expected, the economic impact of SNAP redemptions was less before and after the Great Recession of 2018.

The study examined three time periods – before the recession (2001-07), the recession and its immediate aftermath (2008-10), and post-recession (2011-14). Both metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties saw statistically significant numbers of jobs created during the recession and its aftermath.

SNAP redemptions grew rapidly after passage of the 2009 stimulus package and peaked in 2011-12.

Surprisingly, while pre-recession SNAP reimbursement correlated with job-creation in nonmetro counties, in metro counties before the recession, SNAP had the opposite impact. Metro counties had a 0.2 job reduction for every $10,000 in SNAP redemptions. Researchers said that finding “is not robust” and needs further investigation.

“The main findings … — that SNAP redemptions have a positive and statistically significant impact on county-level employment, that these impacts were larger during the Great Recession than before or after it, and that the impacts were larger in nonmetro than metro counties – are robust across the models estimated,” the study stated.

The study also found that SNAP spending has a “spillover” effect. Increased SNAP reimbursements in one county were linked to job creation in adjoining counties, as well.

This article was originally published by the Daily Yonder.

Continue Reading

Food Economy

Lives in the Balance: Appalachian Food Banks and the Lasting Wake of the Government Shutdown

Published

on

Photo: Courtesy of MANNA Foodbank

With a new federal spending bill signed into law, a national emergency over illegal immigration at the country’s southern border declared and the second government shutdown in as many years now in the rearview, it might be tempting to think that the woes of the government furlough are behind us. But for many Appalachian communities the ripple effect can still be felt, particularly among the most vulnerable.

The 35-day shutdown lasted from December 22, 2018, through January 25 of this year, costing the federal government over $6 billion.

For many in rural communities in the mountains, that meant a lot more than closed parks and late tax documents–it meant standstills at work. And for thousands on the federally-funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP—the modern iteration of food stamps), a delay in their food stamps meant difficulty putting food on the table.

The sudden stoppage put additional stress on already-burdened area food pantries and food banks in some chronically underserved areas, and those effects have left a wake that could last months into the future.

The Mountain Area Nutritional Needs Alliance food bank (MANNA)—the primary food bank in Western North Carolina—scrambled their teams ahead of the shutdown to assess the scope of the situation and figure out who would be most affected.

There are seven National Parks in Western North Carolina, and regional headquarters for nine federal agencies in the Asheville area alone, all staffed by federal workers.  According to the National Treasury Employees Union, there are 6,216 federal employees in Congressional District 11, which stretches from Hickory all the way to the Tennessee border.

For the staff at MANNA, there was a big concern that with every missed paycheck, otherwise secure federal employees and their families could find themselves suddenly struggling.

MANNA is a major organization in the region and distributes more than 18 million pounds of food annually. MANNA partners with 220 local agencies in 16 counties throughout the region.

Photo: Courtesy of MANNA Foodbank

“We also did popup markets over at Asheville Regional Airport,” Mary Nesbitt, MANNA’s Chief Development Officer said. “We went out there so that the TSA folks and [other workers not receiving pay] would have easy access to food.”

At the airport alone, MANNA served 152 people over the course of three different free popup markets, where tables were piled high with a wide variety of fresh foods.

But the furloughed government employees weren’t the biggest burden for the food bank and their regional partner pantries. A disruption in the federally-funded SNAP benefit program left many families struggling to keep their cupboards full.

Nearly two months later, food pantries across Appalachia are still scrambling to meet increased demand.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture directed states to send out February SNAP benefits in mid-January ahead of the shutdown. This forced families to budget almost two-month’s worth of limited benefits that generally stop short of covering monthly food budgets.

“Typically, with SNAP benefits, the amount is used up within the first three weeks. So even apart from the shutdown—just in general because the SNAP benefits don’t stretch out through the whole month—more people will be coming to pantries during that last week of the month when we are on a normal cycle.”

During the shutdown, SNAP recipients had to stretch those benefits over 42 days, resulting in increased pressure on food banks to feed local families affected by the lapse in assistance.

Nesbitt and the rest of MANNA found themselves having to warn their 220 partner pantries to prepare sufficient supplies to account  for an increase in need long after the shutdown had ended, through the end of the month.

In 2015, a survey by the USDA found North Carolina to be the 8th most food insecure state in the nation. In the 23 counties that make up the western part of the state, 16.9 percent of the population goes without regular access to food, and more than 155,000 people receive food stamps.

And SNAP doesn’t fully cover this need, even without interruptions in services.

“The amount that a person receives in terms of SNAP benefits is on a sliding scale based on their income,” Nesbitt said. “Even the highest amount that a family would receive, if you compare it to the amount that a family would spend on groceries for the month, they don’t align.”

“People that are working poor, or people that are working at that $8 an hour job, their SNAP benefits, even with that small amount of income, can sometimes be as low as $42 per month because they have other income. Is it helpful? Yes, does it meet your needs for your food budget? No,” Nesbitt said.

Western North Carolina isn’t the only part of Appalachia still reeling from the shutdown. In New York, the Food Bank of the Southern Tier services 6 counties. With more than 73,000 people already at risk of hunger in the region, the food bank services more than 18,800 people every week, but according to the Evening Tribune, the food bank has seen a 45 percent increase in the pounds of food ordered by their partner pantries.

“SNAP is the first line of defense for hunger and it is not surprising that when something disrupts that safety net, people have to utilize the emergency food network,” President and CEO of the food bank Natasha Thompson told the Tribune. “The Food Bank and our partners can address food insecurity in the short term, but this is a reminder of how effective SNAP is in providing consistent financial and hunger relief.”

According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, pantries there saw as high as a 166 percent increase in need, citing the delay of food stamps due to the shutdown. The Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank covers 11 counties with more than 400 partner pantries that service more than 326,000 food-insecure residents. The Post-Gazette reports that just at their Duquesne headquarters, they have seen a jump of 145 families all citing the deferred SNAP benefits as the reason they need additional help.

In the high country of Candler, right on the outskirts of Asheville, still within the limits of Buncombe County, nearly 60 percent of the population lives below the poverty line. Montmorenci United Methodist Church has become a haven for the hungry, hosting weekly dinners every Monday night and a free market on Thursdays, distributing food donated by MANNA.

Montmorenci has seen a 20 percent rise this winter in the number of families serviced each week, from 75-80 families to well over 100 regularly attending their food events.

”What we are seeing across the board is an increase in people, for whatever set of circumstances, needing to turn to our pantries in order to get through the week and the month,” Nesbitt said.

Just last week, Congress voted to block President Trump’s emergency declaration over immigration, which in-part ended the shutdown in February, setting the stage for another potential showdown that could result in months of partisan gridlock. On top of that, the President’s just-released 2020 budget would slash $17.4 billion from SNAP this year, $220 billion over the next 10 years, leaving organizations like MANNA to pick up the slack.

“For every meal that we can provide, SNAP can provide 12 for people in need,” Nesbitt said. “We are big proponents of that resource being made available to people.”

Jonathan Ammons (@jonathanammons) is a writer, eater, drinker, bartender and musician based in Asheville, North Carolina.

Continue Reading

Food Economy

Cultivating Wine Culture in Virginia’s Last Frontier 

Published

on

Grape vines at JBR Vineyards in Giles County, Virginia. The only designated farm winery in Giles County, JBR grows vitis vinifera wine grapes, commonly known as classic varieties, including Riesling and Pinot Noir. Photo: Amy Loeffler/100 Days in Appalachia

Getting to JBR Vineyards in Giles County, Virginia, is a lot like what pioneer wine importer Neal Rosenthal describes of his first forays into off-the-beaten paths of cult French and Italian wine houses in his book “Reflections of a Wine Merchant.”

Rosenthal writes nostalgically about his adventures in wrong turns, when the lack of handy GPS navigation made his attempts to seek out novel wines for the American market in the late ‘70s that much more of an adventure into the unknown.

In Giles County, too, there’s a lot of meandering through winding country roads marked only by route numbers. But unlike in European wine country, where vineyards neatly carpet the ground for miles, the Appalachian forests often hide manicured grape vines until sudden openings appear on sloping hillsides.

Jessee and Deborah Ring, owners of JBR Vineyards, had their share of meandering and false starts in bringing their winemaking dreams to fruition. Two failed grape crops preceded a 2006 harvest that was deemed successful even though only 40 percent of the vines survived. Despite these challenges, in 2017, the Rings harvested three tons of grapes, which translates to more than 750 bottles.

The establishment of vines at JBR Vineyards stands out for reasons beyond an increase in grape and wine production on the property. The Rings are growing “classic” wine grapes, technically known as Vitis vinifera, including Riesling and Pinot Noir, two grape varieties that specifically favor cooler and drier climes. Pinot Noir has a notorious reputation as a finicky and fragile grape and is even more challenging to grow in the asphyxiating humidity of the mid-Atlantic. It needs cool weather to thrive, but when temperatures drop too low, the grape withers on the vine.

“With classic grapes, dealing with mold and mildew is constantly a challenge in Virginia,” said Deborah Ring. “The grapes are more prone to black rot. Critters also have to be kept at bay with electric fencing.”

In a region of Virginia known more for its affiliation with working class spirits like whiskey and moonshine, wine fever has bolstered grape cultivation, with winemakers leading a culture shift that started 40 years ago. Today the Rings and other commonwealth vitners are following in the footsteps of some long-established wineries in southwestern counties.

Since 1978, locals and tourists alike have been familiar with Chateau Morrisette, a vineyard in Floyd, Virginia, known for its iconic semi-sweet Our Dog Blue blend of Riesling, as well as its sweet dessert wine, Red Mountain Laurel.

Newer wineries have continued to spring up at a steady clip in the region. Abingdon Vineyards began operation in 2001 and closer to Blacksburg, there’s Beliveau Estate which began producing wine in 2011.

A batch of 2017 Riesling waits its turn to be bottled at JBR Vineyards. Photo: Amy Loeffler/100 Days in Appalachia

When the wine industry started gaining traction in the ‘70s as more than a casual passing fancy for retirees, there were six wineries in the commonwealth. That number exploded to 46 in 1995 and to 107 in 2005.

Fast forward to the present day and Virginia is home to nearly 300 wineries, the sixth-most in the nation. Many have clustered in central Virginia, where factors such as elevation and climate are generally favorable to vitners. Those wineries also leverage their proximity to the throngs of tourists from metropolitan Washington, D.C., promoting the region’s prestige as home to the Monticello American Viticulture Area.

In the southwestern corner of Virginia, Congressman Morgan Griffith (R-VA, 9th District) thinks the popularity of wineries will bolster a region that can support its identity as both a rugged outpost and a place that caters to more diverse tastes. Other sections of the state have reconciled these seemingly contrasting selves in the form of agritourism, an industry that supports 344,000 visitors and $120 million in the Southwest region of the state.

Other agritourism businesses in Giles County include Doe Creek Farms, a pick-your-own apple orchard. In addition to providing fresh fruit for its visitors, Doe Creek hosts weddings and offers wine from their family vineyard, located a couple of hours away in the town of Hurt, along the Virginia-North Carolina border.

“It’s important to have that ability for people to tour an area [with wineries] and be able to say ‘let’s try that one’ and go and see a winery that’s a little ways down the road,” said Griffith at JBR’s opening earlier this summer.

But the fact that the Rings are growing vinifera grapes at all has just as much to do with an environmental and climate shift as it does a culture shift in this part of the state.

As temperatures rise and weather patterns become increasingly unstable, erratic weather events associated with a changing climate will prove difficult for managers many agricultural endeavors worldwide, especially wineries.

In recent years, Giles County has experienced the same warming trend affecting world-renowned wine regions, including Champagne in northeastern France. The Rings’ 2018 harvest, though one of the most prolific in JBR’s history, started in August for the fifth time in 15 years. That’s early for a harvest that typically begins in early September and was purported to have begun in October 30 years ago.

“Back in the ‘80s it was tough to put in a vineyard in that part of the state,” said Tony Wolf, professor of viticulture and director of the Alson H. Smith Jr. Agricultural and Research Extension Center in Winchester, Virginia. “In 1985, it would reach -20 or -25 degrees in the winter and it was hard to plant any wine grapes, and certainly not vinifera.”

Wolf came on board as Virginia Tech’s viticulture expert in the ‘80s. Many of the stand-out wine varietals of Virginia we know today gained notoriety after Wolf’s research initiatives scientifically determined which grape varieties would work best in the region. Well adapted to the warm, humid climate, Viognier, Virginia’s official state grape, and the hybrid Chambourcin are among many varieties the state is known for today.

Cultivation of classic grapes is still a rarity in Virginia, especially in Appalachian counties. Of the 5,772 tons of vinifera grown in Virginia in 2017, only 53 of those tons were Pinot Noir. The few tons at JBR Vineyards represented the only Pinot Noir harvest in Giles County.

Would it be easier to grow native hybrids of grapes in this part of the world? Sure. But in spite of the difficulty in growing classic wine grapes in Southwestern Virginia, Jessee Ring wouldn’t have it any other way.

Like many American winemakers, Ring is smitten with the mythology of European grape varieties and the wines they produce. He’s transfixed with growing such prestigious varieties in the hills and valleys of Southwest Virginia.

“The best wines are made from classic wine grapes,” Ring said. “Developed wine palates prefer these. Pinot Noir produces subtle flavors and ages well. In fact, it gets better with age.”

And while classic grapes face plenty of challenges in Appalachia, Ring believes there could also be a practical reason for planting varieties such as Pinot Noir. The grape ripens early, so under certain conditions, it could actually be less susceptible to weather-induced conditions such as mold and rot, compared to its later-ripening cousins.

If growing wine grapes is a burgeoning enterprise in the tiny triangle point of Southwest Virginia, so is drinking their fermented juice. Such a phenomenon is evident at The Blacksburg Wine Lab, a recently opened establishment that’s part salon, part wine bar, part gathering place.

“For years I’ve been saying, ‘I should open a bar,’” said John Boyer, who co-manages the establishment with his business partner Katie Pritchard. “We’re mostly trying to make this into a wine-focused community center. It’s a place where people come together to hang out. Wine brings people together and wine starts people talking.”

John Boyer, a Virginia Tech alum and current instructor, co-created the Blacksburg Wine Lab with his partner Katie Pritchard Photo: Courtesy Blacksburg Wine Lab

Boyer is a Virginia Tech geography instructor, renowned for dismantling the pretense of wine and making it accessible to the larger public through his Geography of Wine class. Though class enrollment started out small in number 18 years ago, it was most recently offered to 1,300 online students.

Boyer’s class was born out of his own appreciation for viticulture. In the early ‘90s, as a geography student, he analyzed the grape growing potential of land parcels across Virginia, which was still just waking up to its potential as a wine-producing state. Boyer became enamored with the idea of a potentially heavy hitting wine industry in the commonwealth, capable of making wines that express terroir in the same way its national and international counterparts do.

A mere 20 years and 250 wineries later, Virginia is far from a sleepy outpost of wine production.

Many Virginia wines, like Octagon from Barboursville Vineyards near Charlottesville, are critically acclaimed, going nose-to-nose with wines from France and California. Wine critic and former Wine Spectator editor James Suckling recently tasted through some Virginia wines and posted his enthusiasm for them on his Instagram account, saying of the 2014 vintage of Octagon that it was, “one of the best reds in Virginia. All about balance and fine structure.”

Pritchard, who is in charge of food and wine pairing at the Wine Lab, is a former student of Boyer’s and enjoys the idea of exploring wine regions in a glass, whether those locales are down the road or across the ocean.

“You can go to a wine bar and travel the world through wine,” said Pritchard who opted to showcase Sicilian wine and victuals for the lab’s inaugural tasting event.

If wine can be a gateway to understanding terroir and culture, the characteristics of a region as they are rendered in the subtle aromas and tastes inside a glass, it raises the question: Will a grape cultivated in southwestern Virginia ever pass muster against its European cousins, exhibiting the region’s mountainous limestone, gently rolling hillsides and humid summers? Pritchard thinks it’s possible.

“Fifty years from now they might find the perfect grape that grows really well in a microclimate of Giles,” she said.

But will that grape be Pinot Noir, like those grown at JBR Vineyards? The answer to that might be that it’s just a matter of time.

Continue Reading

Trending

100 Days

FREE
VIEW