AEP’s plan would bring jobs to an impoverished region, but its structure would break the established regulatory mold in a state that has pushed back on renewables.
Appalachian Ohio, a region hurt by the decline of coal, may become home to one of the largest solar projects east of the Rockies.
American Electric Power submitted a plan Thursday evening to work with two developers to build 400 megawatts of solar in Highland County, Ohio. It would more than triple the state’s current solar capacity and be a big step forward for solar energy in a part of the country where renewable energy has been slow to develop.
AEP says the plan would save consumers $218 million over 20 years because solar power from the project would be less expensive than conventional energy sources.
“This is something that Appalachia needs,” said Dan Sawmiller, Ohio energy policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The jobs of this renewable energy economy are going to go somewhere and I think it’s important that they go where they’re needed.”
But the project’s structure would break the established regulatory mold in Ohio, a state where utilities don’t own power plants and generators compete with each other to supply the cheapest power to the grid.
The savings and the jobs promised are a turnaround from the arguments state officials listened to when they rejected clean energy proposals in recent years. If the new plan is approved by Ohio regulators, it could serve as a template for other new projects in Ohio and in other states.
‘Just Transition’ in Appalachia
The decision to put the project in Appalachian Ohio, which covers the southern and eastern parts of the state, is part of an attempt to bring economic development to an economically depressed region.
“It’s a really hopeful move,” said John Quigley, director of the Center for Environment, Energy and Economy at Harrisburg University, who has written about so-called “just transition” for poor communities affected by the shift from fossil fuels to the new green economy.
“It’s an eye-opener for policymakers that there’s a huge economic development opportunity for solar, especially in communities negatively affected by the energy transition,” he said.
Another recent example is Xcel Energy’s plan to close its coal-fired power plant in Pueblo, Colorado, and build renewable energy projects there.
Highland County, Ohio, where AEP and its solar developers chose to build, has an unemployment rate higher than the state average, and nearby counties have some of the highest unemployment rates in the state. AEP says its plan would bring 3,900 new jobs, most of them in construction, plus 113 full-time jobs in solar manufacturing. Details on the manufacturing jobs were not immediately disclosed.
The plan is part of a boom in solar development that is happening across the country. Some other big solar projects have also been announced in the region but not yet built, including a 150 megawatt solar farm being developed by Invenergy in Hardin County, Ohio. The AEP project would go into service in 2021 if approved.
Challenging Ohio’s Regulatory System
This project is unusual for Ohio because a utility, AEP Ohio, would benefit financially from an electricity generation project. That would be normal in much of the country, but Ohio has a separation between utility companies and the owners of power plants.
AEP’s proposal is seeking to make an exception to this rule by having solar developers operate the solar farms on behalf of AEP Ohio. The costs would be passed on to the utility’s consumers, which AEP says is justified because of benefits to the environment and the local economy.
Opponents likely will argue that this violates Ohio’s open market for electricity generation. In the market, owners of power plants compete to offer the lowest prices and utility companies do not own power plants. More than a dozen states similarly have open markets for electricity generation, including much of New England and the Great Lakes region, and Texas, among others.
Ned Hill, an economist at Ohio State University, says that having a utility pay for certain power plants could stifle investment in competing projects—including other renewable energy projects. He has opposed previous proposals by energy companies and utilities to subsidize coal and nuclear plants, and says this plan is bad for some of the same reasons.
The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio will decide whether to approve the plan in a process that will unfold over the next few months and that likely will focus on the types of questions Hill is raising.
Sawmiller, from NRDC, said he can understand why there are concerns about what this project means for the competitive market, but he thinks the market is structured in a way that has held back renewable energy development.
“If you rely exclusively on the market you lose some of the innovative economic development that’s laid out in this filing,” he said.