Connect with us

Access To Care

Millions of Dollars in W.Va. Drug Treatment at Stake in ACA Repeal Fight



This Tuesday, Aug. 15, 2017 photo shows an arrangement of pills of the opioid oxycodone-acetaminophen in New York. AP Photo.

This article was originally published by the Charleston Gazette-Mail.

Low-income West Virginians received $90 million worth of mental health and substance abuse treatment last year, and nearly $300 million over the last four years, under a law the Trump administration is trying to repeal, according to West Virginia health officials.

Under the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, West Virginia expanded its Medicaid program to those who make up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line.

According to the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, the state’s expanded Medicaid program spentabout $58 million on mental health and substance abuse in fiscal year 2015, $61 million in 2016, $79 million in 2017 and $90 million in 2018.

President Donald Trump’s administration said Tuesday it supports striking down the entire Affordable Care Act. Trump’s Department of Justice wrote that it agrees with a Texas judge’s December ruling that the law is unconstitutional.

The Trump administration had previously argued that only parts of the law — protections for those with pre-existing conditions and limits on premiums for older, sicker people — should be struck down. Trump urged congressional Republicans last week to come up with a law to replace the ACA if it is repealed, although Congress could not do that in 2017-18, when both the Senate and House were controlled by Republicans.

West Virginia is among the states that would be hardest hit by the loss of the health care law, said Simon Haeder, an assistant professor of political science in the John D. Rockefeller IV School of Policy & Politics at West Virginia University.

Loss of access to drug treatment is one of a “slew” of reasons why, Haeder said.

The law requires that health insurance companies pay for substance abuse treatment. Between expanded Medicaid and those who bought plans this year on the state’s health insurance marketplace — which also was created under the ACA — the law provides health care coverage for about 180,000 West Virginians.

“When you gain coverage, you gain access to treatment services,” Haeder said.

West Virginians die from drug overdoses more frequently than residents of any other state.

Haeder said the number of West Virginians who have gotten drug treatment after gaining health care coverage through the ACA “has to be in the tens of thousands of individuals.”

At PROACT, an outpatient drug treatment facility that opened in October in Huntington, between 71 and 75 percent of patients are Medicaid recipients, said Mike Haney, the facility’s director. He doesn’t know how many of PROACT’s Medicaid patients have coverage because of the Medicaid expansion.

But Haney said it would be difficult for PROACT to keep its doors open if expanded Medicaid patients were to lose coverage and stop treatment.

“We would probably have to step back and look at the kind of services we offer,” Haney said. “Because there’s some services, such as the spiritual care, that’s not billable but it’s needed and we can offset it with the money from the traditional-type services.

“But if it came down to our funding, we would have to look at realistically some of the programs that we offer and how can we make them sustainable on their own,” Haney said.

Haney said the ACA has also made it easier for people to get drug treatment by requiring that health insurance companies cover it.

If the ACA goes away, so does that requirement, Haney said. But he wonders if insurance companies might choose to continue coverage anyway, because it’s cheaper for an insurance company to pay for drug treatment than the health complications that come with addiction.

For instance, it would be cheaper to pay for three years of drug treatment than for a heart valve replacement for a drug user who got a heart infection related to intravenous drug use, he said.

Debrin Jenkins, executive director of the West Virginia Rural Health Association, said striking down the law would cause some of West Virginia’s small rural hospitals to shut their doors.

“The rural hospitals who are working on very small margins, some of them negative budgetary constraints will probably go under,” Jenkins said.

Rural hospitals have been closing in states like Kansas, Oklahoma and Alabama, Haeder said.

“One thing that’s keeping [rural hospitals] open in West Virginia is Medicaid expansion,” he said. “Those 200,000 individuals who gained coverage, they have a payer for the hospital services.

“Once a rural hospital closes that’s just not just poor people [who are affected], that’s the entire community that’s losing access to important services. So that’s a problem.”

Jenkins said striking down the ACA would make West Virginia’s rural health care shortage even worse.

“We have a shortage of physicians and nurse practitioners and [physician assistants] now in rural areas,” Jenkins said. “I believe that that will negatively affect their practice and they may move, because again they’re working on very small margins. They can only do so much uncompensated care.”

As of March 25, about 159,000 West Virginians were enrolled in expanded Medicaid, according to the state Department of Health and Human Resources.

The ACA allowed states to expand their Medicaid programs to offer health coverage to people who make up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line.

About 22,600 West Virginians signed up for a plan this year under the state’s health insurance marketplace, another provision of the ACA.

Jenkins said because hospitals are often the largest employers in their counties, their closures would have a negative effect on local economies as a whole.

“If that hospital closes, that county dies, that tax base just plummets,” Jenkins said. “All those subsequent businesses that make their money off of hospital employees — which could be anything from restaurants to dry cleaners to grocery stores to whole medical delivery — all of that just goes down the tube.”

Jenkins said the loss of expanded Medicaid could hurt also the state’s economy.

“For West Virginia to grow economically, sustainably you have to have good medical infrastructure and you have to have a healthy workforce or companies don’t come and set up businesses,” Jenkins said. “If you close the hospitals, you’re not going to have that infrastructure and you’re not going to have that healthy workforce, so we’re shooting ourselves in the foot that way.”

Repealing the law would also put those with pre-existing conditions, like diabetes and cancer, at risk of losing their health care coverage. The ACA requires that insurance companies cover those with pre-existing conditions.

“The state has some of the highest rates of disabilities and illnesses and cancers and childhood obesity,” Haeder said. “And you take the pre-existing conditions protections out of the ACA, those people will not be able to access services because they will be priced out of the market.”

The law also makes it easier for black lung patients and their families to get benefits and requires health insurance plans to cover preventive care like vaccines and well child visits, Haeder pointed out.

“A lot of people think the ACA is something for poor people to gain coverage, but it’s really everyone,” Haeder said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Access To Care

In Appalachia, Hospital Closures Can Have a Profound Impact on the Local Economy



East Ohio Regional Hospital is one of two in West Virginia's Northern Panhandle that are slotted to close this fall. Photo: Glynis Board/WVPB

Two rural hospitals in Appalachia– one in Wheeling, West Virginia, the other just across the river in Ohio– announced they were closing in mid-August. 

Altogether, the closures will directly impact about 1,100 jobs. But, indirectly, it could affect the entire economy of the area. 

“What we found is when a hospital closed, as you might expect, unemployment increased and that was a major impact initially,” said Mark Holmes, director of the North Carolina rural health research program at the University of North Carolina. Holmes published a study in 2006 that looked at the impact of rural hospital closures on community economic health. 

As far as he knows, it’s the only study to date specifically looking at the economic impact of hospital closures on a community. Yet “losing a rural hospital is the precursor to losing your rural community,” said Alan Morgan, CEO for the National Rural Health Association. The NRHA reports there have been 113 rural hospital closures in the United States since 2010 and more than 700 are at risk of closing. 

“First the direct impact of payroll and jobs lost– that’s a direct impact and one we can measure,” said Morgan. “The second is the indirect impact. All of the services a hospital brings– the construction, the food service, the flower sales– there’s a lot of those indirect drivers too. And then I think what the real issue is: What are the impacts you can’t easily measure? Businesses leaving the community because they don’t have access to that 24-7 emergency room service…And obviously young families moving into the communities. Will they still be moving into the community when they know they don’t have access to healthcare?”

For locals, it was well known that Ohio Valley Medical Center– one of the two facilities that is closing– was struggling. 

“When OVMC indicated that they were thinking about closing their doors, we knew that there were some serious issues in regards to psychiatric care and also access to emergency care,” said West Virginia University president Gordon Gee. “And so we immediately swung into action to see how we could fill that gap.”

Gee said before negotiations were complete, though, WVU was surprised, blindsided even, to hear that OVMC was going ahead with a closure. OVMC is now slated to close its doors on Oct. 7. Gee has publicly criticized the hospital for the abrupt closure — saying it doesn’t give anyone enough time to make a plan for covering those services and jobs. 

WVU already owns Reynolds Hospital right outside Wheeling and had entered into a management agreement with Wheeling Hospital earlier this year. Gee said Wheeling Hospital alone had about 350 job vacancies at the time of OVMC’s closure and will be able to absorb some of the jobs lost from the other two facilities. 

Additionally, WVU plans to open two new instant care centers– one in downtown Wheeling and one outside of the city that should absorb some of the day-to-day health care needs of residents.

“The job loss will not be nearly as impactful as I think people are anticipating,” said Gee. “And obviously on the healthcare side in order to meet that population need, we are going to have to hire more people at Wheeling Hospital and at Reynolds, and that’s exactly what we’re doing.” 

To date, the two facilities have hired about 100 people, and WVU reports another 100 are in the pipeline. 

Because of the combination of those factors, the prospects for Wheeling’s economy may not be as bad as they would have been otherwise. 

“In counties that had an additional hospital, they could recover in a couple years,” said UNC researcher Holmes. “You took about two to three  years for recovery, and they sort of kept going on their trajectory. But for those who lost their only hospital in their community, there was a long-run permanent effect on their community.”

That’s not to say there won’t be a transition period. Or that there aren’t concerns. 

“Going forward, the needs still remain,” said Wheeling mayor Greg Elliott. “From the city’s perspective there are three main needs,” citing healthcare, jobs and the value of real estate in the area.  

In this particular case, Holmes’ data suggests Wheeling may survive the threat of losing its two hospitals, thanks to the intervention of WVU. The lesson of the threat remains, however: When a rural hospital closes, not only does the town lose its medical provider, the ripple effects can rip apart the community’s economy. In short, if the other 700 or so rural hospitals at risk of closure in the United States do close in coming years, rural America has a rough road ahead. 

This article was originally published by West Virginia Public Broadcasting.

Appalachia Health News is a project of West Virginia Public Broadcasting, with support from Marshall Health and Charleston Area Medical Center.

Continue Reading

Access To Care

How Do You Fight High Rates of Cervical Cancer in Appalachia? Researchers Say By Showing Up, Building Trust



Photo: Daan Stevens/Unsplash

It’s an enduring fact: You’re more likely to die from cancer if you live in rural Appalachia than if you live anywhere else in this country.

According to a 2016 University of Virginia study, between 1969 and 2011, the incidence of cancer declined in all regions of the U.S except rural Appalachia. And while the rate of people who died from cancer declined throughout the country, in Appalachia disparities persisted. Rural Appalachia has the highest cancer mortality rate; urban non‐Appalachia, the lowest. 

Saving lives that would be lost to cancer requires multidimensional strategies. A recently announced $11 million National Cancer Institute grant is facilitating one such effort. A team of researchers from four universities – Ohio State University, West Virginia University, the University of Kentucky and the University of Virginia – is poised to address a form of cancer that’s disproportionately high in rural Appalachia and one that’s entirely preventable: cervical cancer. 

The researchers will be collaborating with 10 health-care systems serving at-risk communities throughout Appalachian Kentucky, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia.

“This region has one of the highest rates of cervical cancer and cervical cancer deaths in the United States,” lead investigator Electra Paskett, a professor in Ohio State’s colleges of Medicine and Public Health, said in a press release announcing the grant. “We know that smoking tobacco products, HPV infection and lack of timely cervical cancer screening play a significant role in these exceptionally high rates.”

The project will comprise three initiatives to be implemented through clinics and health centers in the region. They include at-home HPV screening, interventions to improve HPV vaccination rates among young people, and smoking-cessation counseling and nicotine-replacement therapy. 

Barriers to Care

“Cervical cancer is 100 percent preventable,” said Stephenie Kennedy-Rea, the West Virginia University Cancer Institute’s associate director for Cancer Control and Prevention and a recipient of the NCI grant. “We have a test that identifies pre-cancerous cells and we have a preventive vaccine. There’s no reason we should have people being diagnosed with late-stage cervical cancer.” 

Karen Winkfield, director of the Office of Cancer Health Equity at Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, agrees: “Cervical cancer is one of the cancers that we have done an amazing job at preventing.”

But rural Appalachians are being screened and vaccinated at lower rates than other parts of the country. Access to care is a primary reason.

According to a 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology “State of Cancer Care in America” report, half of all hematologists and oncologists practice in just eight states, all with high percentages of urban residents: California, New York, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Ohio and Illinois.

“In places like Appalachia, we just don’t have that many providers who can care for individuals close to home,” said Winkfield, who recently served as chair of ASCO’s Health Disparities Committee. Access to transportation is often an issue; the cost of travel is another.

Education – unawareness of the care you need and the care that’s available – also plays a role, Kennedy-Rea said. 

The prevalence of smokers is another factor. Data for 2017 indicates that West Virginia has the highest adult smoking rate in the country, 26 percent, up a percentage point from the previous year, with Kentucky close behind, at 24.6 percent. 

“It’s hard to point to any one factor,” Kennedy-Rea said. “It’s often a combination.”

In many rural Appalachian communities, a strong tradition of individualism and a reluctance to admit to illness prevail, as do deeply ceded religious beliefs, a conviction that God will heal, or that cancer is God’s will and there’s nothing to be done about it. 

Winkfield acknowledges that traditions and beliefs are sometimes factors, but believes that it’s generally more complicated – that when such considerations do come into play, they’re often intertwined with the inherent challenges, the socioeconomic barriers.

“It’s almost putting blinders on, in some ways, because of the challenges. It’s more about, ‘What can I do about it?’” she said. “If you go and you get screened for a cancer and you’re diagnosed with cancer, then what?” 

‘Asking to Be Vaccinated’

Partnerships between academia and community-based health organizations, such as the one the NCI grant is now facilitating, are working to not only respond to that “then what?” but also at precluding the need for the inquiry.

The objectives of this multilevel initiative, Kennedy-Rea said, are to increase cervical cancer screening rates in at-risk communities, elevate HPV vaccination rates and decrease the rate of smoking.

“We’ve seen the ability of clinics to increase their screening numbers and the very positive outcomes from that,” she said. “And they’re able to sustain it.” 

The theory behind implementation science is that you reinforce systems that are already in place, helping them maintain sustainability of the desired interventions. 

Kennedy-Rea said that her office, Cancer Prevention and Control, has traditionally focused primarily on an individual’s behavior. They’re now moving more toward multi-level initiatives, whereby, while continuing to help that individual overcome barriers, they’re taking this systems approach.

“If I send a staff member to southern West Virginia to work for a day and identify people in need of screening, and navigate these folks to screening, we may successfully get 20 to 30 people into screening,” Kennedy-Rea said. 

“If we spend the same amount of time working with a health system, identifying patients within their system who are in need of screening and help them build interventions into their workflow, over the same amount of time we may be able to identify 6,000 people and impact the ability of that clinic to screen those 6,000 people.”

Among the initiatives funded in Appalachia through the grant will be helping parents understand the importance of the HPV vaccine. Kennedy-Rea believes that when the vaccine was introduced, it was understood as a means of reducing sexually transmitted diseases but not as a cancer-prevention measure.

“And I think in Appalachia, that may have hurt the uptake,” she said. “As we help people understand that this is a cancer-prevention vaccine, parents are more willing to have their children vaccinated. I also think that kids are asking to be vaccinated when they have all the information.” 

Long-term Commitment

Winkfield is bullish on such academia/community-based partnerships, most particularly when they’re undertaken in communities where there are only a half dozen or so primary care providers, as is often the case in rural Appalachia.

“If we can provide the support,” she said, “help lift those providers and provide them the resources they need so that it’s not an extra burden for them to do these things – that’s where those partnerships are really, truly invaluable.”

But, she cautions, “It’s a process; it takes a while.” The medical community, Winkfield avowed, is starting to better appreciate the importance of “taking time to understand the culture of the community and understand where people are so that we can meet them where they are.”

This is especially true, she said, in Appalachian communities that are “really tight knit. There’s a trust factor; people have to know that you’re there to stay, that you’re not going anywhere … You can’t pop in and out; you can’t do that type of helicopter research and expect to make a big difference.”

She points to the University of Kentucky and other universities throughout Appalachia as exemplars of long-term commitment. 

Kennedy-Rae and her colleagues anticipate arriving in the communities in the fall, conducting focus groups, gathering baseline data and laying foundations, with implementation launching next spring.

Continue Reading

Access To Care

VA Expands Coverage for Veterans Through Urgent Care Clinics



A U.S. veteran attends the 63rd Anniversary of D-Day in Normandy, France, June 6, 2007. Photo: Dept. of Defense/ Cherie A. Thurlby

About 40 percent of veterans who receive medical care through the Veterans Health Administration are now covered at urgent care clinics. This expansion of benefits for veterans is part of the Mission Act, which went into effect last month. 

Veterans with a service-connected disability used to have to pay out of pocket if they went to an urgent care facility. Now, if veterans have been waiting for care for a long time, or if they live far from a VA hospital, they can receive care through private doctors in their local community. 

James McCormick is a veteran in West Virginia, and he’s recently been named the National Junior Vice Commander of the Military Order of the Purple Heart. He said the new expansion of benefits could have an especially big impact for veterans in the Mountain State. 

“In an area that’s rural, where the distance to a VA is often 100 miles or more, this is actually a really good thing,” McCormick said.

But he said, not many veterans he’s spoken to are aware that they can now use their VA benefits to go to urgent cares.

“It needs to be better communicated. Not all of them know about it. Very few in the mainstream know about it.”

According to a press release from the Beckley VA Medical Center, the new urgent care benefit is meant to give veterans “a convenient way to get treatment for minor injuries and illnesses such as colds, strep throat and pink eye.”

McCormick said that while this new benefit is very helpful, he hopes it doesn’t lead to a funding reduction, or loss of resources for the VA health system.

“We definitely don’t want that to distract or take away from the support or the funding of the existing medical system that we have in place. It’s very important to us as veterans that we have that,” McCormick said.

He said that overall, he’s been happy with the care he’s received through the VA. He suffers from chronic pain, a result of multiple gunshot wounds he received while in Iraq, and when he decided to get away from taking opioids, he was able to treat his pain with a specialized alternative type of pain management therapy at the VA in Huntington.

These types of innovative, alternative therapies are what he hopes the VA will continue to put resources into in the future, as well as increased access to local care, so veterans aren’t having to wait to receive medical care.

“So that’s why I was real excited to see this, you know, giving them access to an urgent care system, a local doctor, someone that they could go to and get assistance right away, I think that’s a good step in the right direction, but we still have a few more steps we have to take.”

Although the VA Mission Act passed through Congress with bipartisan support, some Democratic lawmakers say they hope it won’t set a precedent for more privatization of the VA medical system.

This article was originally published by West Virginia Public Broadcasting.

Continue Reading